When was anthem by ayn rand written




















She also studied screenwriting at the State Institute for Cinema Arts. After Joseph Stalin ascended to power in the early s, a disillusioned and disgusted Rand escaped to Chicago in She then moved to Hollywood to pursue a career as a screenwriter. In , Rand sold her first screenplay, Red Pawn, and her first stage play was produced on Broadway. The play, Night of January 16th, was a largely autobiographical account of the Soviet Union just after the revolution.

She completed her first novel, We the Living, in , and it was first published in She later revised the novella and, in , published it in the United States.

According to the preface she wrote for the American edition, the only differences between the two editions were stylistic.

In the American version, Rand sought to eliminate poetic and flowery language and to simplify and clarify the themes she laid out. Rand is best known for her two longest works of fiction, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged We had been a good Street Sweeper and like all our brother Street Sweepers, save for our cursed wish to know.

We looked too long at the stars at night, and at the trees and the earth. He possesses the soul, as well as the intellect, of a great scientist. By virtue of this kind of unshakeable independence, Rand argues, humankind forges ahead, moving from ignorance to enlightenment. Many of society's great thinkers and innovators were persecuted in much the same way that Equality is. For example, Socrates was executed for the originality of his moral principles.

Galileo was threatened with torture by the Inquisition for daring to defend Copernicus, and his contemporary, Giordano Bruno, was burned at the stake. Charles Darwin was damned for originating, and John Scopes jailed for teaching, the theory of evolution. Robert Fulton was scorned, Henry Ford mocked, and Louis Pasteur reviled because of their inventions or new ideas.

The court of social opinion has generally convicted freethinkers. But by being freethinkers, the Equality s of the world are unconcerned about the evaluations of others. Free thought and action continue. But when an innovator like Equality is caught in a political dictatorship that physically prevents him from researching, experimenting, or studying, then the creative mind is stifled.

But the mind must be left free to think and to act on its findings, which is the deepest principle lying at the heart of this story. In a free society, an original thinker like Equality is free to experiment and research, to invent and innovate, and to make scientific breakthroughs and technological advances.

This concept is why the world's freest countries have made so many discoveries and have achieved such a high standard of living. Science and progress require intellectual freedom.

A totalitarian state stifles the freedom of mind that such progress depends on. A worldwide totalitarian state, as depicted in Anthem , leaves the mind with no refuge. Thinkers like Equality have no place to go. They are trapped in a system that stifles freethinking. Rand argues that a society in which the mind is stifled will not merely fail to progress, it will regress, losing all the advances that.

In defending the freedom of the mind as a necessity of human survival and prosperity, Anthem is a precursor to Ayn Rand's major novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

All of these works feature some aspect of this theme. Anthem shows the collapse into Dark-Age barbarism that results when the mind is stifled. Test your knowledge of Anthem with quizzes about every section, major characters, themes, symbols, and more. Go further in your study of Anthem with background information, movie adaptations, and links to the best resources around the web. Ace your assignments with our guide to Anthem!

SparkTeach Teacher's Handbook. Summary Read our full plot summary and analysis of Anthem , scene by scene break-downs, and more. A young man known as Equality rebels by doing secret scientific research. When his activity is discovered, he flees into the wilderness with the girl he lov Anthem, Ayn Rand Anthem is a dystopian fiction novella, by: Ayn Rand, written in and first published in in the United Kingdom.

When his activity is discovered, he flees into the wilderness with the girl he loves. Together they plan to establish a new society based on rediscovered individualism. Jul 25, Danny Salinger rated it did not like it Recommends it for: emotionally mature people interested in a good laugh. Shelves: half-read. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

If, for some reason, the values of individuality or independence are completely alien to you, you should read this book. Everyone else is better off skipping it. It has nothing else to offer and it's got a good chance of convincing that you're smarter or more enlightened than you actually are. Granted, I was a bit biased against Ayn Rand while reading this.

But before reading this I had that sort of play-aversion that you carry around because it's fun to make fun of famous dead people. After reading this my contempt for her has become deep and far-reaching. The setting is simplistic and nonsensical. Unlike other dystopias such as or Brave New World , it's not portrait of a functioning oppressive society or a sad commentary on human nature as much as it is a vague, untenable strawman.

Other dystopias are written with an awareness or sensitivity towards the human condition. Brave New World dealt with our willingness to completely ignore issues and problems as long as we're entertained. Anthem on the other hand, deals with our willingness to sacrifice logic, comfort, entertainment, and freedom for the good of our neighbors. Oh wait In fact it flies in the face of the oldest, and most confounding problem in the social sciences, The Tragedy of the Commons.

Biology and psychology have also found that self-sacrifice without compensation is an exceedingly rare phenomenon, and that animals including humans are ,as a general rule, selfish.

Even the Soviet Union, a major influence behind this book, was only maintained by the general acceptance of the communist ideal for a short time before it was replaced with the KGB and the threat of the gulags. Considering how easy it was for Equality to escape from confinement, I'm comfortable saying that critical element was absent. This might be more excusable if it was meant to be a highly stylized hyperbole like The Giver , but Rand says herself in the introduction that this is not only the inevitable sum of collectivism, but what all socialists and collectivists secretly WANT.

All this leads me to believe that a person who could seriously believe, much less write, this would have to be someone who saw their self-interest as unique, and imagined the majority of humanity a swathe of ambitionless drones. That, or a reader who's mouth salivates at the word "individuality" and who, when it comes to the affairs of the world, automatically equates cynicism to realism because it makes them look clever and critical. The writing's painfully overwrought as well.

You have to understand this book is listed as half-read because despite my several attempts I can't finish it. I either get tired of self-indulgent prose and put it down or I start reading it out loud and I can't take it seriously a friend and I did this to pass the time while waiting for a bus once. The character thinks in short, declarative sentences that seem to rely on the reader seeing his struggle as novel and impactful. If you don't do this automatically there's nothing really there to MAKE you.

The struggle in question, is a one-dimensional tug of war between We and I without the complexity or variability seen in actual human thought. Even the treatment of individuality once it's "achieved" is trite. After you figure out the "I" and the "ego" you're pretty much scott-free. You don't have any uncertainty about what you want to do or who you want to be, and you don't have to worry about things like self-deception, insecurity or over-confidence to mess with you.

Congratulations, you are one of an elite few! Rand's portrayal of selfishness and independence as some miracle cure is sophomoric and overly simplistic, and it gets hammered into you from the beginning. It's not even as if calls to challenge, question, and break social oppression or embrace your individuality are hard to find, even in Rand's time, and a lot of these calls don't have to resort to strawmen or heady promises of perfection. Even song lyrics Tilly and the Wall, Say Anything, Incubus treat the topic of self-definition and social constraints with more intelligence.

This book might have been revolutionary for its time, but we've moved on as a culture. We've gotten over the novelty of selfishness being a virtue and social control being a bad thing, and we've managed to produce far more intelligent treatments of the subject. View 1 comment. Shelves: , erica-and-diane-club. Mocking, Childish Review The ending, with the Statue of Liberty emerging from the beach, was a nice twist.

You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell! And, yes, for those keeping score at home, I do intend to use this exact same review for every dystopian novel I read. At least I amuse myself and, really, isn't that what matters most? Slightly Less Childish Review Look, I fully appreciate how Ayn Rand and her family suffered at the hands of the Soviets before she fled for America in the s, and I understand how that would lead her to develop her virulently anti-socialist philosophy and write novels decrying the most dehumanizing aspects of communism.

But, as with most propaganda -- and I don't use that word pejoratively, but simply to mean literature used to promote a cause -- it's got an expiration date. It's been two decades since the Berlin Wall fell, and for the vast majority of the world, communism isn't much of a threat anymore. So, aside from studying the history of communism, is there much reason to read such propaganda at this point, especially propaganda as lacking in literary value as "Anthem" and Rand's other books?

I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet. I am neither foe nor friend to my brothers, but such as each of them shall deserve of me.

I do not grant my love without reason, nor to any chance passer-by who may wish claim it. Aside from plus-sized, pain-killer-addicted Republican talk-radio hosts and octogenarian former Federal Reserve chairmen, who takes this horseshit seriously at this late date?

OK, in addition to the aforementioned, I guess there's one other group of readers for Rand's novels even in the 21st century: self-centered, bookish teenagers seeking affirmation for their assumptions that they alone are individuals, they alone have it all figured out, they alone understand how the world really works, and everyone else is a mindless conformist. Stupid sheep! Then, at some point, Lord willing, those readers grow the hell up, realize that no man is an island after all, and switch to reading real literature.

If not, they become the voice of the GOP, I guess. As for the rest of us? Readers wanting to reacquaint themselves with Rand's writing -- especially given the two new biographies out, and much media attention being paid lately to both Rand herself and her ongoing influence on the Republican Party -- can knock off "Anthem" in less than an hour, and not have to waste their time with the brick-sized "Atlas Shrugged" or "The Fountainhead. And it's a slightly better book for teenagers than "Twilight," I suppose, with a marginally better message.

View all 35 comments. I generally don't read much dystopian, but just thought, 'what the hell, let's give it a go'. Although the concept for Anthem sounded promising, on the whole I felt it was poorly executed.

Being relatively short I had nothing to lose, unfortunately by the time I reached the last page, put the book down on the table, went to make a coffee, before gazing out the window, Anthem had already started it's super quick journey of escaping my thoughts, scampering off to the nearest forest. So then, this i I generally don't read much dystopian, but just thought, 'what the hell, let's give it a go'.

Even some words have been completely obliterated from the language, and all citizens carry a designation such as 'Equality ', in this case, the name of our protagonist, who we learn right away was probably unfairly assigned to the duty of street sweeper for the great collective. Also in this time his newfound wisdom and courage causes him to flirt like Casanova with an attractive girl he calls 'The Golden One'.

He starts developing some much forbidden feelings for her. In other words, he wants to jump in her pants. Our hero flees to the dangerous wilderness, quickly followed by his beloved, and they start their new lives together. Though Anthem contains some interesting moments, it falls flat on it's face for several reasons, not least because Rand's writing style seems incredibly tedious and pretentiously boring. Also the story just isn't convincing at all, we're expected to believe that the main character is familiar with such complicated terms and expressions which should be unknowable to someone with that kind of background.

It's absurd that he's able to pick up books, read them, and understand with little to no problem. Maybe he was a book junky in a previous life, who knows. As for Rand, she preaches with a sense of disregard, her efforts have been rewarded calling her a visionary, when she is clearly doing nothing more than following a trend to bash communism, socialism, and any political theory that does not promote capitalism and competition.

Obviously Rand's own position in Soviet Russia comes into play, fair enough, why wouldn't it. A Utopian society as fundamentally evil as this because it suppresses technology?.

What Rand forgets is that a society's worth should not be judged solely on technological advances and science. The world is a little more complicated than that to just go lumping things into different categories. Weak philosophically and written with mediocre literary finesse, I really don't know what all the fuss is about. I regret having wasted my money on it Hang on? I didn't. It was borrowed. That's the only positive. View all 18 comments. Jul 14, Lea rated it it was ok Shelves: fiction , ebook , philosophy , audiobook.

A dystopian novella set in the world where totalitarian collectivism has triumphed to the greatest extent. I did see Rand's potential as a writer, but in this book, her ideas are underdeveloped, and far too simplistic for my taste, and for her to be considered a philosopher, at least at this stage. Book did have some quotable passages but nothing fascinating or invigorating. She sees the collective aspect of society as the source of all evil and is completely neglecting its value. For the word "We" must never be spoken, save by one's choice and as a second thought.

This word must never be placed first within man's soul, else it becomes a monster, the root of all the evils on earth, the root of man's torture by men, and of an unspeakable lie. The word "We" is as lime poured over men, which sets and hardens to stone, and crushes all beneath it, and that which is white and that which is black are lost equally in the grey of it. It is the word by which the depraved steal the virtue of the good, by which the weak steal the might of the strong, by which the fools steal the wisdom of the sages.

The foundation for objectivism is laid as rational selfishness is advocated. The sacred meaning of existence is in indulging one's ego. Not for people that see value in altruism! Also, libertarian views are noticeable as she values personal freedom and self-reliance above anything else. And the essence of complete freedom is deliverance from the influence of others.

Can help but think that her appeal is built upon psychological trauma from group oppression intertwined with wounded self-worth and need for the approval of egotistical worldview. To be free, a man must be free of his brothers. That is freedom. That and nothing else. Rand also considers the idea of falseness and the impossibility of unconditional love. For her, love to be true and authentic has to be conditional. I shall choose friends among men, but neither slaves nor masters.

And I shall choose only such as please me, and them I shall love and respect, but neither command nor obey. Besides farfetched ideas and unrefined philosophy, the storyline was unimaginative, with substantial plot holes, and world-building unconvincing. It is a short novel but much more could have been done, and I read writers that did wonders in fewer pages.

If Rand concepts get more complex and advanced in later books as it is said, I think I would like to read them, knowing the level of influence she had and the controversy she sparked. Dec 26, Heather rated it really liked it Shelves: old-favorites. This book really helped me get my self esteem back together. This was my mantra going into college I think it got me through a lot of BS. It is not bad to remind yourself of the following things every once in a while My hands.

My spirit. My sky. My forest. This earth of mine. What must I say besides? These are the words. This is the answer. I stand here on the summit of the mountain.

I lift my head and I spread my arms. This, my body and This book really helped me get my self esteem back together. This, my body and spirit, this is the end of the quest. I wished to know the meaning of things. I am the meaning. I wished to find a warrant for being.

I need no warrant for being, and no word of sanction upon my being. I am the warrant and the sanction. It is my eyes which see, and the sight of my eyes grants beauty to the earth. It is my ears which hear, and the hearing of my ears gives its song to the world. It is my mind which thinks, and the judgement of my mind is the only searchlight that can find the truth.

It is my will which chooses, and the choice of my will is the only edict I must respect. Many words have been granted me, and some are wise, and some are false, but only three are holy: "I will it!



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000